Guiding Principles
The ethical and scientific foundations that guide CSEG’s work.
A Responsible Framework for Climate Intervention Research
The Climate Systems Engineering Group (CSEG) is committed to supporting evidence-based public decision-making in the context of increasing climate risk. Our work focuses on evaluating climate response scenarios, scientific uncertainties, and governance considerations related to emerging climate intervention research.
We operate with a strong commitment to transparency, peer-reviewed science, ethical responsibility, and international cooperation.
Geoengineering as a Public Interest Responsibility
Although private sector involvement in developing geoengineering technologies can play a valuable role and should not be discouraged, oversight and regulation must always prioritize the public interest. Appropriate national and international authorities should be responsible for ensuring that such technologies are governed responsibly and transparently.
01
Inclusive Public Engagement and Decision-Making
Researchers working on geoengineering initiatives should, wherever feasible, inform, consult, and seek consent from communities and stakeholders affected by their activities. The scope of engagement depends on the technology involved—localized solutions may require national or regional consultation, while approaches with global consequences demand international dialogue and cooperation.
02
Transparency and Open Access to Research Outcomes
All geoengineering research activities should be conducted with full transparency. Research plans must be disclosed, and findings—both positive and negative—should be openly published. Open access to results is essential for building public trust and enabling informed assessment of potential risks.
03
Evidence-Based Scientific Analysis
All CSEG research is grounded in rigorous scientific methodology and structured evaluation of climate response scenarios, uncertainties, and potential impacts. Our objective is to contribute to informed public and policy-level decision-making under conditions of global climate risk.
04
Recognition of Scientific Uncertainty
Climate systems are inherently complex. Research into approaches such as Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI) involves significant uncertainty, and outcomes cannot be predicted with complete confidence. These uncertainties are a central consideration in our assessments.
05
Independent Assessment of Impacts
Potential environmental, socio-economic, and geopolitical impacts of climate intervention research must be evaluated by independent bodies. Where impacts may extend beyond national borders, assessments should involve appropriate international institutions.
06
No Substitute for Emissions Reduction
Research into climate intervention strategies is not a replacement for emissions reduction, mitigation, or adaptation efforts. These remain fundamental to addressing climate change and must continue in parallel.
07
Research-Only Scope
Climate intervention concepts examined by CSEG are research-based and hypothetical in nature. We do not engage in deployment or operational activities. Our role is limited to scientific analysis, risk evaluation, and governance considerations.